From THE ART NEWSPAPER
Uncertain Tax Outlook Clouds Collectors’ Donation Decisions
by Daniel Grant
NEW YORK—Many art collectors and wealthy individuals are facing remarkable uncertainty in the current federal estate and gift tax laws. Both the federal gift tax and the generation-skipping transfer tax, currently 35 percent, will rise to 55 percent next year in the absence of congressional action. “Everyone is waiting to see what, if anything, Congress will do. It’s a weird year,” said New York attorney Ralph Lerner, a leading art law specialist. However, he noted that even without an estate tax, donors to museums continue to receive an income tax deduction. For some, “2010 is a time of incredible opportunity for estate planning,” said Catherine G. Schmidt, a lawyer and partner with Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, New York. The federal gift tax permits individuals to make gifts to their children ($13,000 per child, $26,000 per couple) throughout their lifetime up to $1million tax-free, while the generation-skipping tax allows gifts of up to $3.5million to grandchildren tax-free. Gifts larger than those amounts trigger a tax of 35 percent in 2010. “If you want to give more than $1million to your children, give it now while the gift tax rate is lower,” Schmidt said.
Decisions are particularly tough for people trying to plan ahead, because Congress may write new limits for tax rates and exemption on estate property, potentially making the statute retroactive to the beginning of 2010 (a year in which there is no federal estate tax) and using 2009 rates (up to $3.5million tax-exempt, with the remainder taxable up to a maximum of 45 percent)—or, legislators may not be able to agree on anything, at which point estates in 2011 will again be taxed at 2002 rates (tax-exempt only up to $1million, with the rest taxable at 55 percent). It hasn’t been an easy year for museums soliciting donations of money and objects from estates, since those estates haven’t felt the pressure of the tax code to make charitable gifts. Peter Marzio, director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, acknowledged that tax considerations play a part in when and how much donors give, noting that the museum’s development staff regularly discusses planned-giving techniques, such as bequests, fractional gifts and remainder trusts, with prospective donors to create “an awareness of what might be in their best interest and in ours.”
Among the pieces of legislation Congress has yet to take up is a bill introduced by Senator Charles Schumer (Dem., N.Y.) that would ease restrictions on fractional gifts, allowing donors to extend the period over which they could take deductions from the current 10 years and permitting the amount of the deduction to rise with the value of the artwork. Louis Grachos, director of the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, N.Y., said that with the current uncertainty about the law, donors “don’t feel comfortable right now. I have heard from prospective donors who’ve said, ‘I don’t know what I should do.’ It’s one more hurdle for museum directors.” However, Terry Morello, vice-president for development at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, said she has not seen “any resistance on the part of donors to give this year.” She added that there have been no instances of family members reneging on a bequest. Dewey Blanton, spokesperson for the American Association of Museums, reported “somewhat mixed signals from the field. Some are concerned about the uncertainty surrounding the estate tax, others seem unaffected. Museums seem to be more concerned about the here and now, given the continuing struggles of the economy, and may be somewhat less focused on the long-term implications of this issue.” He added that the AAM hopes that “Congress takes up the issue during the lame-duck session. In the meantime, AAM will continue to make the case for incentivizing charitable giving, through the estate tax and other methods.”
Tax-free gifts from one generation to another may include art. Schmidt noted that gifts of tangible property like art must be reported to the Internal Revenue Service in tax filings, accompanied by a report from a qualified appraiser. “The objects actually have to be transferred from one person to another,” she added. “A collector can’t just keep it in his or her home and say that the painting now belongs to a grandchild, for instance. They need to sign over a deed of gift and physically transfer the artwork to the recipient.” In the case of minors, who legally may not be able to own property, gifts would be held in trust until they reach majority.
Hazy and hot in Beijing, and the same might be said about the Chinese auction market where backroom dealing may be driving the extraordinary high prices paid at auction. On Monday and Tuesday I attended the preview of Beijing Poly’s Spring sales and was astonished at the volume and quality of Chinese art available.
There will be sales of everything from fine Chinese wine to antique automobiles and jewelry to more traditional categories of porcelains, jades, lacquer, furniture, ink painting and works by contemporary Chinese artists. I felt like a kid in a candy store having the opportunity to handle exquisite and rare Ming and Qing porcelains like this imperial washbasin which sold for close to $US4 million, lacquers, jades etc…
The modern ink painting exhibit was wonderful with masterful works by artists very familiar to Western collector such as Lin Fengmian, Zhang Daqi, Wu Guanzhong, Qi Baishi, as well as with works by artists famous in China but less known in the West, such as Zhang Ding, Fan Zeng and Zhou Sicong (1939-1995) whose painting, “Miners”, sold for around US$2.5 millon. What really drew me to Beijing Poly’s Spring Auctions was the sale of part of the Ullens Collection of contemporary Chinese art. The Ullens are Belgian collectors who established the Ullens Center at 798 Art District and are in the process of shifting their focus from Chinese art to contemporary Indian art for reasons that would be a good subject for a future blog post.
